Peer Review Process

• Double-Blind Review: All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

• Evaluation by Reviewers: Each manuscript is assessed by two or more independent experts in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the quality of the research, its relevance, methodology, scientific contribution, and compliance with research ethics.

• Feedback to Authors: Reviewers provide constructive feedback and suggestions for revisions or improvements.

• Revision Process: Authors are required to revise their manuscripts based on reviewers’ comments and resubmit the updated version for further evaluation.

• Final Decision: The editorial team makes the final decision—acceptance, acceptance with minor/major revisions, or rejection—based on the reviewers’ evaluations and the revised manuscript.

• Purpose: This rigorous process ensures the publication of high-quality, relevant, and ethically conducted research in HOSPITERA.